Best Ski Goggles of 2024

Ski goggles are a specialty of ours: We’ve tested, reviewed, and all-around debated the merits of more than 50 designs over the years. It’s a dynamic market, but the good news is that no matter your experience level or budget, there is a great ski goggle waiting to be found. At the premium end, magnetic interchangeable lenses and HD-like optical quality are the norm. Field of view is another area of innovation, highlighted by the unique curved lens on Smith’s 4D Mag. And intermediate, beginning, or casual skiers can still pick up a good goggle for $150 or less. Below are the best ski goggles for the 2024 season. For more background, see our ski goggle comparison table and buying advice below the picks.

Editor’s note: We updated our ski goggles guide on April 24, 2024, to add the Zeal Optics Lookout. We also included information about our testing practices and scanned the round-up to ensure all prices, designs, and write-ups are up to date.
 

---

Our Team's Ski Goggle Picks

• Best Overall Ski Goggle: Smith I/O Mag ChromaPop
• Best Budget Ski Goggle: Smith Range
• Best Interchangeable-Lens System: Anon M4 Toric MFI
• Best Goggle With a Photochromic Lens: Glade Adapt 2
• Best Large-Frame Ski Goggle: Oakley Flight Deck L
• For Maximum Field of View: Smith 4D Mag
• Most Ventilated for Backcountry Skiing: Julbo Lightyear

---

Best Overall Ski Goggle

1. Smith I/O Mag ChromaPop ($270)

Frame size: Medium
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: Spherical
What we like: Fantastic optics, comfortable fit, and available in a range of sizes.
What we don’t: Pricey; quick-change system isn't the most efficient.

If Smith dominates one area, it’s snow goggles. There are a number of models to choose from at varying price points, but the I/O Mag is our favorite. Released as a quick-change variation of the classic I/O, the goggle features superb optics with an expansive field of view, comes with two lenses, has an extremely comfortable fit, and is one of the best ventilators we’ve tested. Smith's ChromaPop tech offers HD-like color quality that translates to exceptional clarity in a wide range of conditions, and the lenses do a remarkable job highlighting small details like bumps, crud, and debris—even in low light. The goggle also comes in three different frame sizes to dial in fit: The I/O Mag S is for small faces, the I/O Mag XL has the largest fit, and the standard I/O listed here fits a medium-sized face perfectly. 

Despite our love for the I/O Mag, no goggle is perfect. For one, the Smith's lens interchange system isn’t the quickest on the market—that title goes to Anon's M4 below. While the locking levers do give us peace of mind from a security standpoint, you have to remove the goggles to change out the lenses (for comparison, the Anon's lenses can be swapped without removing the goggles—just twist the frame and pull the lens away). The I/O Mag's field of vision is also a slight step down from larger designs like Smith's own 4D Mag below or the XL variation mentioned above, although the difference in performance is relatively minor (and the bigger size may be uncomfortable for medium faces). A final nitpick is the lack of hard-sided case, which we typically expect at this price point. But for top-of-the-line optics, quality, and durability, the I/O Mag is a runaway favorite and checks all the boxes for most skiers... Read in-depth review
See the Smith I/O Mag See the Smith I/O Mag S

 

Best Budget Ski Goggle

2. Smith Range Goggle ($60-$80)

Frame size: Large
Number of lenses included: 1
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: Decent comfort and performance at a great price.
What we don’t: Lens comes up short in foul weather and challenging lighting.

Just about everything involved with skiing is expensive—from the equipment to lift tickets—so we love finding a good value. With an MSRP that’s less than one-third the price of our top pick (and it’s discounted even further at the time of publishing), the Smith Range is just that. This goggle features a large frame (the women’s Drift offers a medium fit) with decent edge-to-edge visibility that minimizes the tunnel effect you find on many cheap designs. Further, you get upgrades like multi-layer foam cushioning for comfort and Smith’s proven anti-fog coating. The Range also has a refreshingly classic look with a full frame encompassing the low-profile cylindrical lens.

What are you giving up at the Range’s budget-friendly price? To start, you only get one lens, which means that you can’t swap between tints based on the weather. If you opt to buy a replacement lens (which is unfortunately hard to track down at the time of publishing), swapping will take some time and effort due to the very basic interchange system. In addition, you miss out on Smith’s ChromaPop lens technology, so the clarity and precision fall well short of the I/O Mag above. If you only get out a couple times a year or plan your trips around favorable conditions, these aren’t big compromises. But those who spend a lot of time on the hill, particularly off trail and in inclement weather, will be better off with a higher-end model. For an even cheaper option from Smith that has a medium fit but makes some compromises in comfort, check out their $45-$55 unisex Frontier and women’s Vogue.
See the Smith Range  See the Women's Smith Drift

 

Best Interchangeable-Lens System

3. Anon M4 Toric MFI ($320)

Frame size: Large
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: Toric (cylindrical available)
What we like: The fastest lens change on the market and excellent field of vision.
What we don’t: Expensive; not everyone needs the quick-change system.

Smith may have pioneered the interchangeable-lens system, but Anon is mastering it. Much like its predecessors, the M2 and M3, the M4’s magnetic lens swapping is best-in-class. It’s as easy as giving a slight twist to the frame to expose the lens and pulling it away from your face. Anon honed things in even further with this model thanks to a very sturdy frame that protects the lens and holds it securely in place (ours has survived multiple crashes without issue). Further, the M4’s versatile construction allows you to swap between cylindrical and toric lenses (additional lenses cost extra) depending on preferences in style and performance. We still give the slight optical edge to ChromaPop due to its more vibrant and natural colors, but Anon has the top quick-change system on the market. Finally, while the standard model here has a large, glasses-compatible fit, Anon also offers the M4S for medium-sized faces.

The MFI in the M4’s name is for the included magnetic clip-in face mask, which combines with the goggle to create a blocker system against driving wind and snow without fogging the lens. Our one nitpick with the mask is that it’s so thin that it lacks a strong structure, so if you’re breathing heavily while hiking, the material can be sucked into your mouth. But all of the other key components are there with the M4 MFI, including triple-layer foam and a variety of lens options to cover you from bright to cloudy. If you can track it down, Anon's newer and slightly lower-profile M5 costs $20 less and comes with all the bells and whistles of the M4, although those with high bridges may find the nose a bit snug and uncomfortable (if that's the case, stick with the M4)… Read in-depth M4 review
See the Anon M4 Toric MFI  See the Anon M4S Toric Goggles

 

Best Goggle With a Photochromic Lens

4. Glade Adapt 2 ($149)

Frame size: Medium/large
Number of lenses included: 1
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: Excellent price for a well-built goggle with a quick-reacting photochromic lens.
What we don’t: Availability can be hit or miss; bulky look.

With big players like Anon (Burton), Smith, and Oakley dominating the goggle scene, it’s a tough place to break through. But that’s exactly what Glade has pulled off. The secret: quality builds with mass appeal at standout prices. Our current favorite from their four-goggle lineup is the Adapt 2 (and smaller 2S), which packs in a string of high-end features for a wallet-friendly $149. Design highlights include a clean, frameless shape, stout materials that are clearly made to last, and a competitive field of view for its medium/large size (although the relatively thick shape of the goggle does impact visibility straight down). Additionally, we think Glade nailed the essentials with comfy padding, excellent fog prevention, and a frame that paired well with a range of medium-sized helmets we tried.

We’ve had mixed experiences with photochromic lenses over the years: The adjustable tint can be slow to react to changing conditions, and they often run too dark. But Glade’s lens tech is the best we’ve used, with a super wide VLT range of 16 to 61% that excels even during heavy snowfall. In terms of optical quality, it may lack the HD-like effect of some of the premium options from Smith or Oakley, but it’s not far behind and roughly half the cost. Our only real nitpicks are the aforementioned bulky shape and that Glade is a small, online-only brand, so availability can be hit or miss (plus, you can’t try them on before buying). But if you can score a pair and want a photochromic lens, the combination of price and performance is hard to beat.
See the Glade Adapt 2  See the Glade Adapt 2S

 

Best Large-Frame Ski Goggle

5. Oakley Flight Deck L Prizm ($186-$216)

Frame size: Large
Number of lenses included: 1
Lens shape: Spherical
What we like: Massive field of view and quality optics.
What we don’t: Only comes with one lens; old lens change system.

One of the more distinctive designs on the mountain, Oakley’s Flight Deck has been a longtime favorite thanks to its oversized, rimless style. The large spherical lens gives the goggle its signature look, and combined with a low-profile shape, you get one of the largest fields of view on the market (particularly at its price point). Compared with the Smith I/O Mag above, you see more of the mountain in all directions—up, down, and side-to-side. And beyond Oakley’s anti-fog coating, the higher-volume fit means this goggle is even more fog-resistant. Tack on Oakley’s Prizm technology, which is neck-and-neck with Smith’s ChromaPop, and this is one impressive—and stylish—ski goggle.

The most notable downside is that the Flight Deck only comes with one lens (additional Flight Deck Prizm lenses start at $75). And should you invest in a second lens, the quick-change isn’t exactly fast by most people’s standards and less intuitive than modern options (we’ll admit to turning to YouTube for a tutorial). The goggle's large surface area and frameless design also result in a slight drop in durability—it's important to store them correctly between uses to avoid scratches. But this doesn’t detract from the excellent visibility, all-day comfort, and high-end build quality of the Flight Deck. For a similar all-around design but with a trimmed-down, medium/large fit, check out the Flight Deck M.
See the Oakley Flight Deck L Prizm  See the Oakley Flight Deck M Prizm

 

For Maximum Field of View

6. Smith 4D Mag ($340-$370)

Frame size: Medium/large
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: BirdsEye Vision
What we like: Top-quality build with a noticeable boost in downward visibility.
What we don’t: Hard to justify the jump in price over the I/O Mag above.

Released several seasons back to quite a bit of fanfare is Smith’s top-end 4D Mag. Building off the standard I/O Mag above, this goggle has an improved magnetic lens-change system and a slightly larger fit, but the big news is the lens shape. Called BirdsEye Vision, the lower portion of the lens curves inwards, opening up downward visibility by 25% (according to Smith). It’s hard to fully verify that claim, but the difference is immediately apparent when trying it on back-to-back with alternatives like the I/O Mag and Oakley Flight Deck. For those who put a premium on maximum field of vision—such as riders who spend a lot of time in difficult terrain off piste or in the bumps—the 4D Mag is a nice option.

Why hasn’t the 4D Mag overtaken the I/O Mag as our top-rated goggle? The primary reason is price: There's no doubt it's a fun piece of tech, but visibility in general has become much less of an issue among modern, premium goggles. As such, many skiers will find it difficult to justify the $70-$100 jump in cost (although the included hard-sided case is a nice touch). Moreover, there's a faint line and a small amount of distortion right at the curve in the lens (while skiing, however, the line is not noticeable). Finally, like the I/O Mag above, the 4D Mag's lens change system is a little slower and clunkier to use than Anon's. But in the end, it comes down to priorities, and the 4D is best-in-class when it comes to unencumbered views... Read in-depth review
See the Smith 4D Mag  See the Smith 4D Mag S

 

Most Ventilated for Backcountry Skiing

7. Julbo Lightyear ($320)

Frame size: Large
Number of lenses included: 1
Lens shape: Spherical
What we like: Simple yet extremely effective anti-fogging system.
What we don’t: Only offered a large size and with photochromic lenses.

For uphill travel, many backcountry skiers are forced to ditch their goggles due to persistent issues with fogging. Enter Julbo and their simple yet effective SuperFlow System: The lens on their Lightyear goggle is attached to a set of small hinges, which can be pushed forward to separate it from the frame. This creates enough airflow to dissipate any moisture buildup and eliminate fogging, even during high-output activities. And it’s quick and easy to push the lens back into place (even with gloves on) for the descent. For backcountry riders, ski mountaineers, or even those who often run hot on extended sidecountry hikes, the Julbo Lightyear is a revelation.

What are the compromises with this ventilation-focused design? For one, you pay a premium for the goggle at $320, which only includes a single lens. The good news is that it’s a quality photochromic design with a wide VLT range (5 to 83%) that will work in the vast majority of conditions. This is particularly great for ski mountaineers who start their day in the dark and finish on blinding glaciers. As with other photochromic lenses, it does have some pitfalls—such as reacting slowly going in and out of trees—but it’s largely effective, and you rarely notice any issues. A bigger potential concern is fit: The Lightyear is currently only offered in a large frame size, which could be too much goggle for some folks. But if you can get a good fit, the Julbo’s combination of versatile optics and truly impressive ventilation makes it a great do-it-all resort and backcountry option.
See the Julbo Lightyear

 

Best of the Rest

8. Smith Proxy ($150-$170)

Frame size: Medium
Number of lenses included: 1
Lens shape: Spherical
What we like: Great optics and ventilation at a solid price.
What we don’t: Many competitors include two lenses.

Smith doesn’t have a lot of holes in their snow goggle lineup—they pretty much cover it all—but the Proxy manages to fill a gap with its a framed look, spherical lens, and medium fit. And in testing the Proxy, it was clear they’ve created another winner. This goggle hits a real sweet spot in the market: The medium shape should fit a lot of faces well, field of view is truly impressive, and the ChromaPop optics perform as expected (i.e., really well). And the well-sorted ventilation and anti-fog coating did its job, even when wearing a mask and with closed vents on our helmet on windy and colder days. Priced right at $150-$170, the Proxy adds up to a goggle that should satisfy the needs of a good chunk of the resort market.

In terms of complaints, the main knock on the Proxy is that it only comes with one lens, so it’s important that you nail the right VLT for your local conditions. Err on too dark of an option, and you may be in a tough spot on a socked-in day. Though not surprising at this price point, the Proxy also has a basic, press-and-peel lens change system that's susceptible to smudges and outdated compared to modern magnetic designs (like what you get with Smith's upgraded I/O Mag and 4D Mag above). Also, this is purely a matter of personal preference, but not everyone will be a fan of the framed look. As expected, however, Smith has you covered with their frameless Skyline ($180-$200). Given the choice between the two, we’d go with the Proxy, which matches it in pretty much all ways but saves you about $30... Read in-depth review
See the Smith Proxy

 

9. Giro Method Goggle ($140-$150)

Frame size: Large
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: Great peripheral vision for a mid-range design.
What we don’t: Middling fog prevention.

We’ve found Giro comes up a little short on average compared to Smith, Oakley, and Anon at the premium end of the market, but they excel in the sub-$200 category. Their Method is a great case in point: Its large yet low-profile frame delivers excellent peripheral vision, and the three-layer foam padding does a nice job with both next-to-skin feel and moisture wicking. The design is also hardwearing with a full frame to protect the sides of the lens and rugged materials in general. While not as quick as magnetic designs, the Giro's interchange system is relatively easy to use, and we appreciate that two lenses are included with purchase. For park riders and beginners alike, the popular Method is a solid option—and the plethora of unique strap designs to choose from only adds to all-around appeal.

Where does the Method come up short? Like the brand’s Axis below, the ventilation system seems to prioritize protection around the frame over all-out airflow, which makes it a bit more prone to fogging up. In addition, the large shape and relatively tall height can impact compatibility with some helmets, although it pairs well with Giro products. The goggle also only comes in one size (large), which may look—and feel—overly bulky on those with smaller heads (those folks may want to check out Giro's Article II, which has a medium fit). Finally, it’s worth noting that Giro also offers their well-respected Blok goggle for $20 less, but we think it’s worth stepping up to the Method for the second included lens (the Blok only comes with one).
See the Giro Method

 

10. Zeal Optics Lookout ($199-$319)

Frame size: Medium
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: A well-rounded performer with high-end optics, an expansive field of view, and quality photochromic tech.
What we don’t: Expensive, only available in one size, and falls slightly short of the I/O Mag in a couple areas.

Zeal Optics may lack the name recognition of big players like Smith and Oakley, but make no mistake: This Colorado-based brand has a healthy lineup of quality designs ranging from budget to premium. The Lookout featured here sits at the very top and is highlighted by Zeal’s Observation Deck Technology (ODT), which positions the bottom of the frame closer to the face than the top to boost upward and downward visibility while minimizing reflection on the inner lens. In testing, the increased field of view was immediately noticeable when wearing the Lookout back to back with other goggles, allowing us to clearly read the terrain below. We also came away impressed by how quickly the photochromic lenses adjusted as we dipped in and out of the trees, and overall lens clarity and quality line up with the goggle’s premium intentions (although Smith’s ChromaPop is essentially unmatched).

The Zeal Lookout was an admirable all-around performer in testing, but we did come away with a few small complaints. First, while the aptly named Rail Lock lens change system is overall very user-friendly and doesn’t require taking the goggles off, it’s a little less intuitive—and not as glove-friendly—as what you get with Smith’s Mag designs or Anon’s M4. Our photochromic lens also incurred some minor scratches, which was partially a result of haphazard packing, although we wish Zeal included a hard-sided case for better assurance over time. Finally, the Lookout only comes in a single medium-size fit, which may not work for those with particularly small or large faces. A final downside is price, although the Lookout’s overall performance and build quality strike us as worth the investment for committed riders.
See the Zeal Optics Lookout

 

11. Glade Fathom ($169)

Frame size: Medium
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: Fantastic value for a magnetic quick-change system and quality photochromic lens.
What we don’t: A little less refined than its primary competitors (although it’s cheaper).

Glade is really making a name for themselves in the ski goggle space, and the second model to make our list is their mid-range Fathom. Like the Adapt 2 above, the Fathom offers a whole lot of bang for your buck: high-quality photochromic lens (16%-61% VLT) and sturdy frame, excellent ventilation, and niceties like triple-layer foam with a soft next-to-skin feel and silicone striping on the inside of the strap to keep everything in place. But where the Fathom stands on its own is the magnetic quick-change system and included second low-light yellow lens. For storm days that are truly socked-in—we get our fair share of those in the PNW—the low-light lens’ 73% VLT has a lot of value. And speaking of value, the Fathom comes in at a very palatable $169 all in.

Why did we end up ranking Glade’s Adapt 2 above the Fathom? The short answer is you’re not getting any optical improvements for your extra $20—in fact, the Fathom has a slightly smaller field of view (although its correspondingly smaller frame size is a plus for those who prefer a standard, medium fit). Additionally, we think the magnetic system could use a little refinement: The stiff frame requires more effort than Anon’s M or Smith’s Mag designs to remove, and we found the lens didn’t always snap back into place perfectly (it sometimes required a second push to lock in the bottom and top edges). But we’re still talking about a screaming deal here, as most magnetic quick-change goggles are well over $200. Unfortunately, at the time of publishing, the Fathom goggle is widely out of stock. The Fathom+ goggle, however, has all the features we love in the regular Fathom, but swaps the cylindrical lens for a toric lens and includes Glade’s new quick release goggle strap for $30 more.
See the Glade Fathom

 

12. Smith Squad Mag ($240)

Frame size: Medium/large
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: Classic Squad looks and performance with a faster lens change.
What we don’t: Pricey for a cylindrical design with only average field of view.

Smith's Squad Mag combines a quick-change system that's nearly identical to their pricey 4D Mag above with a more budget-friendly cylindrical shape. Its semi-framed look is immediately recognizable—the standard Squad has been a go-to for years among snowboarders—and we found that it fits nicely with a wide range of helmet models. Like the other Mag designs, you get two high-quality ChromaPop lenses to maximize performance in a range of conditions, effective venting and a quality anti-fog coating, and triple-layer foam along the interior that's proven to be extremely comfortable. It's available in a low-bridge version, too.

In wearing the Squad Mag back to back with the other Smith options, however, some complaints popped up. Most notably, the Squad’s bulkier frame has a pretty big impact on field of view, particularly along the sides and in the bottom corners. It also feels quite a bit heavier, which means the goggle doesn’t fade as much into the background throughout the day, and the foam padding started showing signs of wear after just a few days of testing. None of these are dealbreakers for us, and those who like the look of a cylindrical lens shouldn’t be deterred, but the downsides push the Squad Mag to a mid-pack finish... Read in-depth review
See the Smith Squad Mag

 

13. Oakley Fall Line Prizm M ($186-$216)

Frame size: Medium
Number of lenses included: 1
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: Premium optics and comfort with a bold look.
What we don’t: Not a leader in field of view; many competitors include two lenses.

Oakley’s Fall Line M goggle (formerly called the Fall Line XM) packs their premium lens technology into a trimmed-down shape. With a similar fit as Smith’s I/O Mag above and Giro’s Axis below, the goggle fits easily under most ski helmets but still makes a pretty big statement with its bold, frameless style. As expected from Oakley, the goggle is very well made, and the range of Prizm lenses are strong all-around performers. The Fall Line M does buck the quick-change trend and sticks to their somewhat clunky Ridgelock lens-swapping system, but we do appreciate that it provides a very solid seal with no room for wind to sneak through. Importantly, breathability is still competitive, and we've had no issues with fogging throughout testing.

We like the Fall Line M, and the medium-size fit is a nice way to get a toned-down version of the Flight Deck above, but we do have a couple nitpicks. Most importantly, the Fall Line only comes with a single lens while nearly every other competitor includes two. Second, the substantial frame makes the goggle sit a little too far off the face, which translates to less peripheral vision. If you’re an Oakley devotee and like the styling, the Fall Line certainly won’t be a letdown, but we think there are better alternatives out there. For a lens that lands somewhere between the Fall Line here and Flight Deck above, Oakley's Flight Tracker line comes with toric lenses that balance the wide field of view of spherical lenses with the low-profile styling of cylindrical designs… Read in-depth Fall Line review
See the Oakley Fall Line M  See the Oakley Fall Line L

 

14. Dragon PXV2 Goggle ($250)

Frame size: Medium/large
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: Toric
What we like: Great field of view and long-lasting anti-fog coating.
What we don’t: So-so build quality.

One of the newest additions to their collection, Dragon’s PXV2 addresses a common complaint in the goggle market: field of view. With a relatively low-profile shape, toric lens, and medium-large fit, the PXV2 offers comparable peripheral vision as top players like the Smith I/O Mag above (and noticeably better than the brand’s X2 and NFX2). We’ve also been impressed with the anti-fog coating, which kept the lens moisture-free even on a couple extended sidecountry trudges. Optics fall towards the middle of the pack—in favorable conditions and for night skiing, the two included lenses covered the bases, but we found the mirrored option (Lumalens Red Ion) was rather dull and made it hard to pull out small bumps and details in shadowed sections on the hill.

In general, we like the PXV2 and have found it to be the best all-around model we’ve tested yet from Dragon. Unfortunately, however, it’s only $20 less than the aforementioned I/O Mag and falls short in a number of ways. Most prominently is build quality: The Dragon’s frame is rather stiff and prone to creaking, and the semi-rigid shape meant that it never completely conformed to our face (there was a small but noticeable gap along the cheeks). In addition, the SwiftLock quick-change system is a little finicky and can’t match the convenience of a magnetic design. Specifically, you have to make sure you’re lining up the top and nose bridge portions of the lens before securing or else it won’t seat properly. In the end, the Dragon isn’t one of our favorites, but it's a solid pickup if you happen to find it on sale.
See the Dragon PXV2 Goggle

 

15. Smith Squad XL ChromaPop ($150)

Frame size: Large
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: Huge visibility and ChromaPop lenses.
What we don’t: Overkill in terms of size for most skiers/snowboarders.

Smith’s Squad was an instant hit, and they expanded the line (literally) with the Squad XL. To start, this is a massive goggle—comparable to the Oakley Flight Deck above in lens height. At the same time, it’s surprisingly low-profile because of its budget-friendly cylindrical lens shape and simple feature set. The net result is a massive field of vision and pretty darn good clarity thanks to the two ChromaPop lenses. As expected from the "XL" size, you also get a larger field of view compared to the standard Squad, along with more comfortable triple-layer foam (the Squad has two layers of padding).

Many large goggles work well with a variety of head sizes, but we think the Squad XL’s shape is more limiting. The super tall dimensions and flat profile give it an odd look on medium/large-size faces (although we didn’t have too many issues fitting the goggle under most helmets). The basic lens change system is also dated compared to modern magnetic tech, and swapping lenses can be a bit tedious. Finally, build quality fell short of what we’re used to from the I/O line—there was a noticeable gap between the lens and frame in one corner. That could be chalked up to a one-off issue, however, and the Squad XL does get you two massive lenses at a very good price of $150.
See the Smith Squad XL ChromaPop

 

16. Giro Axis Goggle ($190)

Frame size: Medium
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: Complete feature set at a great price.
What we don’t: Ours had fogging issues.

Giro’s Axis takes direct aim at the I/O series. Like the legendary line from Smith, you get a medium fit, two high-quality lenses, plush three-layer foam, and great all-around visibility. The Axis also features Giro’s updated quick-change system, which works as follows: Twist the goggle slightly, grab the exposed section of the lens, and pop the four pins out of each corner. Removing the lens and reinstalling it requires a little force, and we don’t love that you have to press directly on the lens to push the pins in place, but it’s certainly faster to swap than the standard I/O (the I/O Mag above, however, edges it out). To sweeten the deal, the Axis undercuts the I/O by $20 and the I/O Mag by $80—and importantly, you still get two lenses.

Unfortunately, the Axis was a letdown in terms of fog prevention. It’s hard to pinpoint the culprit, but the reinforced vents along the top and bottom of the frame seem to limit airflow more than the open design that you get with the I/O collection (of note, not all of our testers experienced this problem). Further, we found the Zeiss lenses to be a bit duller overall than ChromaPop, although we certainly appreciate the natural colors and feel. All in all, if Giro is able to fix the fogging issues, the Axis would make a big jump up our list... Read in-depth review
See the Giro Axis  See the Women's Giro Ella

 

17. Spy Ace Goggle ($130)

Frame size: Medium/large
Number of lenses included: 2
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: Retro looks and a good all-around value.
What we don’t: Limited frame and lens color options.

Retro-inspired cylindrical lens goggles are growing in popularity, and Spy’s Ace is a quality mid-range option. For over $100 less than the Smith Squad Mag above, you get a surprisingly similar feature set: two lenses included, triple-layer foam, and a medium fit. Further, the relatively low-profile shape pairs well with most ski helmets and doesn’t have the tunnel-like feel typical of many budget designs. Breathability is also up to par, including good ventilation through the top and bottom of the frame. All told, we think Spy has struck a nice balance between performance and value with the Ace.

For downsides, the brand’s proprietary Happy Lens design is a pretty strong performer but can’t keep up with the high-end Prizm and ChromaPop options above. The flat shape impacts peripheral vision, and it’s not as sharp as we’d like in low-light situations. Additionally, you get far fewer lens tint and frame color options, which is limiting from both a performance and style perspective. Finally, the goggle’s interchange system can be temperamental, and it’s easy to leave fingerprint smudges on the lens while making the swap. But these are fairly easy nitpicks to overlook given the Ace’s competitive $130 price.
See the Spy Ace Goggle

 

19. Bolle Freeze Goggle ($35)

Frame size: Medium
Number of lenses included: 1
Lens shape: Cylindrical
What we like: Cheap.
What we don’t: Everything about them is cheap.

Bolle’s Freeze is the kind of cheapo goggle that’s perfect for a first-time skier, kids who will quickly grow out of their small size, or to keep in your bag as a backup. Like its predecessor, the classic Mojo, the goggle is very basic with a thick frame, small field of vision—peripheral visibility is especially compromised with the cylindrical lens—and dull optics. The Freeze isn’t all that comfortable either with simple foam padding, and the straps have to stretch to fit over a bulky helmet.

But we’re talking about a $35 goggle here, and all of those complaints about the Freeze are to be expected. For someone who skis frequently but still is on a tight budget, we recommend springing for the slightly more expensive Smith Range above—it's more comfortable, has a much better lens, and boasts a decidedly more modern look and feel. One final note related to the Freeze: Bolle does offer a clear tint option, which is useful for those who plan on night skiing a time or two during the season.
See the Bolle Freeze Goggle

 

Ski Goggle Comparison Table

Goggle	Price	Size	Lenses	Shape	Style	OTG
Smith I/O Mag ChromaPop	$270	Medium	2	Spherical	Frameless	Yes (I/O XL)
Smith Range Goggle	$60-$80	Large	1	Cylindrical	Framed	No
Anon M4 Toric MFI	$320	Large	2	Toric	Framed	Yes
Glade Adapt 2	$149	Medium/large	1	Cylindrical	Frameless	No
Oakley Flight Deck Prizm	$186-$216	Large	1	Spherical	Frameless	Yes
Smith 4D Mag	$340-$370	Medium/large	2	BirdsEye	Frameless	No
Julbo Lightyear	$320	Large	1	Spherical	Frameless	No (available)
Smith Proxy	$150-$170	Medium	1	Spherical	Framed	No
Giro Method	$140-$150	Large	2	Cylindrical	Framed	Yes
Zeal Optics Lookout	$199-$319	Medium	2	Cylindrical	Frameless	Yes
Glade Fathom	$169	Medium	2	Cylindrical	Semi	Yes
Smith Squad Mag	$240	Medium/large	2	Cylindrical	Semi	No
Oakley Fall Line XM	$186-$216	Medium	1	Cylindrical	Frameless	Yes
Dragon PXV2 Goggle	$250	Medium/large	2	Toric	Framed	No
Smith Squad XL ChromaPop	$150	Large	2	Cylindrical	Framed	No
Giro Axis Goggle	$190	Medium	2	Cylindrical	Frameless	Yes
Spy Ace Goggle	$130	Medium/large	2	Cylindrical	Framed	No
Bolle Freeze Goggle	$35	Medium	1	Cylindrical	Framed	No

About Our Testing Process

Many staff members at Switchback Travel love to ski—whether that entails skinning deep into the backcountry or lapping the resort. Former editor-in-chief and lifelong skier John Ellings put together our initial list of ten goggles in 2015, drawing from years of experience on the slopes throughout the Pacific Northwest. Founder David Wilkinson also helped dial in the list, contributing his observations as an avid skier with roots in both the PNW and Colorado. Editor Maddie Downie took over the guide in 2024. A longtime Washington resident and skier, Maddie has toured all over the North Cascades and is intimately familiar with socked-in days and challenging conditions. 

Our current lineup of 19 goggles reflects our ongoing testing experiences, firsthand info from testers and gear-savvy friends, and feedback from the online skiing community. Optical quality is one of our primary considerations when testing ski goggles, so we make a point to take them into varying conditions, from whiteouts to bluebird days. We also pay close attention to breathability, especially when touring or venturing into the sidecountry, as well as how well each goggle holds up over time. Finally, we evaluate features like padding and lens change systems to discern comfort, ease of use, and overall quality. We recognize that the ski goggle market isn't static, and as a result, we continue to test new and noteworthy designs as they become available. 
 

Ski Goggle Buying Advice 

• Lens Shapes: Cylindrical, Spherical, and Toric
• Optical Quality: ChromaPop, Prizm, Vivid, and More
• Mirrored, Polarized, and Photochromic Lenses
• Visible Light Transmission (VLT) and Lens Color
• Interchangeable Lenses
  • Quick-Change Lens Systems
• Field of View
• Ventilation and Fogging
• Framed vs. Frameless Goggles
• Foam Padding and Comfort
• Fit and Sizing
• OTG (Over the Glasses) and Prescription Inserts
• Helmet Compatibility
   

Lens Shapes: Cylindrical, Spherical, and Toric

Cylindrical
Most entry-level ski goggles are cylindrical, meaning they curve across your face horizontally but are flat vertically. This shape is easier and cheaper to manufacture but can result in less peripheral vision, minor distortion at the top and bottom of the lens, and more glare. The primary reason to opt for a cylindrical lens is cost, but some just prefer the look, which avoids the bug-eye style on many modern spherical models. Notably, there has been a shift in the market over the past couple years, with a number of mid-range and premium goggles released with cylindrical lenses. Advances in lens technology (covered below) are decreasing the negative impacts of the cylindrical shape, and many of our top models have this lens type, including the Giro Method. Its large lens is competitive in field of view and clarity with pricier spherical options from Smith and Oakley.
 

Spherical
Even with the recent shift towards cylindrical designs, many premium goggles are spherical, meaning the lens curves both horizontally and vertically. The curve is intended to mimic the shape of your eyeball to give a natural, superior field of view and optics. In use, we’ve found this to be largely true (especially in peripheral vision), although as mentioned above, the differences between lens types aren't as noticeable as they once were. Spherical lenses do give the goggle a taller profile with its bubble-like shape, and while it’s a matter of personal preference, we like the look most of the time when it’s paired with a ski helmet. Models that feature this shape include Oakley's Flight Deck and Smith's Proxy.
 

Toric
A third shape that is gaining traction is the toric-style lens. This design splits the difference between cylindrical and spherical: It’s curved both vertically and horizontally to mimic the shape of the eye like a spherical lens, but is less pronounced and bulbous looking. The advantage of a toric lens is largely aesthetic, and it will appeal to folks that don’t like the bug-eye look of a spherical lens but still want the rounded shape. From an optical perspective, it’s becoming more and more difficult to parse out the differences, but it should perform similarly to a spherical lens by minimizing distortion at the edges. Top toric-shape goggles for the 2024 season fall primarily on the premium end of the spectrum, including Anon’s M4 MFI and Giro’s Contour (not included here).
 

Optical Quality: ChromaPop, Prizm, Vivid, and More

Advancements in quick-change technology are exciting, but we prioritize optical quality above all else. It’s the reason why a total of four Smith goggles with ChromaPop lenses made our 2024 list. The lens technology is that good. ChromaPop is the best we’ve used for richness of color and contrast (it's nearly HD-like in its clarity and natural feel) and we're happy to see the lens offerings have increased to include most styles in the Smith lineup.
 

ChromaPop surely is not alone in high-quality optics. Oakley’s premium competitor is their Prizm lens, which does a great job in making details stand out, although it can look a little more artificial than ChromaPop in certain tints (some are overly pink, for example). Giro turned to Zeiss, a proven camera lens manufacturer for help with their lenses, and we’ve been impressed with the clarity of the Vivid lens line including the Giro Axis. Anon and Dragon keep most of their lens development in-house and offer competitive detailing (Anon's top-end Perceive lenses are particularly good), although in general they fall a little short in overall quality. It's important to note these upgraded lenses are most valuable in difficult lighting and aren't a necessary feature, but the difference is noticeable and can be worth the extra investment for the committed skier and snowboarder.
 

Mirrored, Polarized, and Photochromic Lenses

Moving beyond families of lenses like Prizm, Vivid, or ChromaPop, there are specific lens technologies designed for harsh or variable conditions. For bright, sunny days, mirrored lenses work really well. The lens has a reflective coating on the outermost layer that softens the glare by allowing less light to enter. You’ll find mirrored lens options across the board designed for use in the brightest conditions. Another lens technology is polarized, which was originally intended for use on the water, but it also reduces eye fatigue on a bright day by blocking strong bursts of horizontal light. The technology doesn’t translate perfectly to snow when you may want to see the glare of an icy patch, and their biggest downside is cost—the Anon M4 Polarized is $380, which is $60 more than a Perceive option.
 

The final technology is photochromic lenses, which adjust automatically to lighting conditions based on the intensity of light. This gives them a very wide VLT range (more on that below), and they are great if you don’t want to have to swap lenses during the day. However, we’ve had mixed experiences with photochromic lenses over the years: On our Smith Skylines, for example, a section of the lens refused to change the tint, which rendered them useless. And others we’ve tried ran dark enough to be problematic on socked-in days, plus the tint didn’t change fast enough as we dipped in and out of trees. That said, both Julbo's and Glade’s photochromic tech—as seen on Julbo's Lightyear and Glade's Adapt 2 above—have proven to be quick-reacting, reliable through multiple seasons of testing, and offer a super wide VLT range that isn’t excessively dark. If you want a single-lens solution, Julbo's goggles at the high end and Glade’s at the mid-range are what we currently recommend. We've also had positive experiences with Zeal Optics' photochromic lenses for their Lookout Goggle.
 

Visible Light Transmission (VLT) and Lens Color

VLT is the amount of light that is allowed to pass through a lens (measured from 0% to 100%). In the brightest sun, you may want a lens with as little as 10% VLT. For night skiing, a “clear” goggle is around 90% VLT. There is some variation between manufacturers, but lenses generally are 15-40% VLT for bright to normal conditions and 40-70% VLT for cloudy and snowy days. For reference, the Julbo Lightyear has the widest VLT range on our list (5% to 83%), which is particularly helpful for ski mountaineers who may experience everything from low-light conditions in the early morning to blinding glaciers in the mid-afternoon sun. Other factors matter like polarization and lens color, but these are the general parameters. 
 

You’ll often see a product page for a popular snow goggle showing a huge range of lens color options. The choice comes down to 1) VLT; and 2) Your tint preference (i.e., how you want to see the ski world around you). At the low end of the VLT spectrum are blacks, grays, and blues, which are designed to block out the most light and therefore are the darkest. Toward the middle for partly cloudy days are purples, reds, and greens, which, as you can imagine, color how the snow and mountains look significantly. For overcast and gray days, you’ll find lenses that are much clearer than the first two categories and come in very light shades of yellow and blue.
 

Interchangeable Lenses

Nearly every goggle made has the option to change out the lenses, although the difficulty varies by manufacturer and product. The traditional method involves pulling (and sometimes lightly tearing) the frame away from the old lens and sliding/snapping in the new one. It’s a clunky and slow process that can be frustrating, especially when reconnecting the lens around the nose bridge. That said, for those who purchase a goggle with a single lens or only plan to change tints on rare occasions, it can be serviceable (although we recommend making the swap at home rather than outside on the mountain). Many budget-oriented models rely on this basic system, including Smith’s $60-$80 Range.
 

Quick-Change Lens Systems
If you intend to purchase a goggle with two lenses and swap them a fair amount, even during the middle of a ski day, opting for a modern, quick-change design is worth it. The current leader in this technology is Anon, which uses a magnetic system on their “M” collection that allows you to swap out lenses without taking the goggles off your head. It’s amazingly simple (we’ve timed ourselves doing the swap in just 5 seconds), and the powerful magnets do a great job of keeping the lenses from falling out in all but the worst crashes.

Smith and Giro have similar magnetic designs that are featured on models like the Smith I/O Mag and Giro Axis, although you’re required to push a button/lever to release the lenses on certain models, which we’ve found to be slightly less convenient but a bit more secure. And brands like Dragon and Scott utilize lever-based systems that offer similar convenience, albeit in a slightly less premium setup. Again, not everyone needs to put a quick-change system high on their priority list, but it’s a useful feature for adapting quickly to variable lighting conditions.
 

Field of View

With the growth of large-frame goggles has come a corresponding jump in field of view (also referred to as “field of vision”). Modern designs feature wide and tall lenses and low-profile frames, which enhance peripheral vision and help avoid the narrow, tunnel-like feeling that was inherent with older goggles. More visibility makes for a safer day on the mountain, so we’re completely on board with this trend. In general, spending more gets you an improved field of view, and a well-made, large-size frame like the Oakley Flight Deck Prizm is almost as good as not wearing a goggle at all. Smith’s 4D Mag takes it to another level by curving the bottom of the lens to increase visibility straight down (for easily accessing things like a jacket zipper) and in the bottom corners. And for smaller faces, Giro’s Expansion View technology (found on the Giro Axis and others) does a nice job of retaining good visibility with a compact, face-hugging design on both their spherical and cylindrical lens models.
 

Ventilation and Fogging 

If your goggles are all fogged up, it doesn’t really matter what kind of lenses you are using. The first step in minimizing this issue is to make sure you choose a double lens (note: All of the models to make our list have this feature). Next, consider the frame design: Ventilation comes from the sides, top, and bottom of snow goggles, and the more air that moves through, the less fogging will occur. The specific size and shape of the vents is goggle-specific, so make sure to inspect the pair that you are considering. If possible, try it on while wearing your ski helmet to ensure the latter doesn’t block your venting. Other tips to avoid fogging include not overdressing (this will cause your face and head to sweat more) and keeping your goggles on during your ski day. Moving goggles to your forehead will cause the heat and moisture emanating there to fog up.
 

Another key piece to the puzzle is your goggle's anti-fog coating, which is applied to the inside of the lens. To avoid degrading the treatment, it's important to limit the amount of times you wipe moisture off the lens (only do this in the most desperate of times). Instead, if they get wet, air-drying is the best solution or you can bring an extra pair of goggles (or lens) in your ski pack if you need them in a hurry.

For those with persistent fogging issues during down times (such as on the lift) or if you want to wear your goggles during high-output activities like ski touring or sidecountry hiking, Julbo has an innovative answer with their SuperFlow technology. With hinges on the sides of the Lightyear's frame, you can push the lens away to create enough separation to quickly dissipate moisture and avoid fog buildup. Clearly, it’s a unique system that excels in certain environments (you’ll need to push the lens back into place on the downhill), but the technology is there for those who need it. The above tips cover some of the basics of this topic, but for a deeper look check out our article on How to Prevent Your Ski Goggles From Fogging.
 

Framed vs. Frameless Goggles

Frameless or rimless designs ditch the plastic around the edges of the lens on a traditional goggle, giving them a distinctive, oversized look. The most common argument in support of these designs is their improved field of vision. And a frameless goggle like the Oakley Flight Deck admittedly does have expansive views (at the compromise of a little more vulnerability to damage at the edges). However, the majority of the credit should be given to its large spherical lens and low-profile design. Frameless goggles also can make it easier to remove the lenses, although again, the more important factor is its interchange technology. For example, the difference between the frameless Anon M2 and framed Anon M3 and M4 is basically nil—with the M3 and M4, the extra effort required is a slight twist to expose a corner of the lens from the frame. In the end, the disparities in performance between a framed and non-framed goggle are pretty negligible. Just pick the style you like best. 
 

Foam Padding and Comfort

As with many types of outdoor gear like ski helmets and ski backpacks, the quality of padding differs significantly on ski goggles and gets markedly better the more you spend. On basic models, the padding is simple single-layer foam that isn’t as comfortable around your face as pricier models and won’t fit as snug. It also will retain more smell and moisture and break down quicker. When the price tag gets to the $100 to $200 price range, you’ll find multi-layered foams and flexible plastic frames that are impressively contoured to the shape of the face. If you only plan on skiing a few weekends each year, going with a cheaper ski goggle is a perfectly rational choice. But those who spend a lot of time on the slopes will appreciate the comfort and fit of a higher-end goggle with superior padding.
 

Fit and Sizing 

Sizing is one of the most important—and sometimes confusing—parts of the goggle buying process. First and foremost, ski goggles come in three general sizes: small, medium, and large. You will find some women’s-specific models in more “feminine” colorways and with a slightly narrower frame, but goggles really are a unisex piece of gear. In addition, you'll see "low bridge" options for those who find the fit of a standard nose bridge to be too tall.

When trying on a goggle, you want the fit to be snug but not tight enough to cause discomfort. Additionally, pay attention to your field of vision. A goggle that is too small will impact your vision side to side and up and down. Common pressure points are the nose and around the eyes, which can be relieved by making adjustments either with the sliding clip or buckle system around back. If the goggle still feels tight after loosening, it’s time to move up in size. As we cover below, trying goggles on with your ski helmet (or at least a similar ski helmet in the store) will give you the most accurate picture of how everything will feel on the mountain.
 

OTG (Over the Glasses) and Prescription Inserts

We have good news for wearers of prescription glasses: There are a number of over-the-glasses (OTG) goggles on the market. OTG goggles are defined by a generous opening between the lens and face to fit a pair of average-sized spectacles. In addition, there will be notches in the sides of the frame to accommodate the arms of the glasses. Oakley is a leader in OTG designs, and from their lineup, everything from the medium-fit Fall Line XM to the oversized Flight Deck are compatible. Smith, Giro, Anon, Glade, and others also have a range of eyewear-ready models, including the Smith I/O Mag XL and Anon M4 MFI. It’s worth noting that a goggle that’s labeled as OTG does not guarantee your glasses will fit inside, particularly if they’re bulky and large. That said, most medium to small glasses with low-profile arms will work.

One nagging issue with wearing your prescription glasses under a pair of ski goggles is fog buildup. The extra material inside of the lens impacts airflow, and just as importantly, your prescription glasses lack an anti-fog coating. Plenty of eyeglass wearers are willing to make this compromise (or switch to contacts), but there’s another solution: prescription inserts. These compact liners fit right on the inside of the lens, which greatly improves airflow and allows your venting system to function normally. California-based SportRx is the market leader in prescription inserts with a range of models that allow you to tailor the fit to your goggles (you include the make and model with the purchase, and they manage the rest). The cost is somewhat high at $90 for a standard insert, but it’s a good investment for those who want to maximize all-around performance.
 

Helmet Compatibility

Finding a suitable helmet to pair with your ski goggles that doesn’t result in the dreaded gaper gap (a large opening between the goggle and helmet) or worse, doesn’t fit at all, used to be a challenge. Nowadays, most helmets and goggles work pretty well together. That being said, if you aren't able to try the goggles and helmets on before buying, it's safest to stick to a single brand (i.e., purchase both a Giro-brand helmet and goggle).
 

One exception is tall, large-framed goggles like the Smith Squad XL. Those may require a helmet with an accommodating brim, such as the Smith Level MIPS. Overall, we’ve found that premium helmets are the most compatible with a wide range of goggle sizes, but keep an eye out for features like a baseball hat-like bill that could interfere with the goggles. The large, angled brim on the Bern Watts is one of the worst offenders and limits its compatibility to mostly medium-sized goggles. And if you’re somehow still not wearing a helmet, it’s time to change that: check out our article on the best ski helmets. 
Back to Our Top Ski Goggle Picks  Back to Our Ski Goggle Comparison Table